A rather obscure news story came to my attention recently, and triggered some musing.
On October 12, France passed a law extending the same penalties (a year in prison, 45K euro fine) for denying the Holocaust to the so-called Armenian Genocide, a horrific massacre back around 1915. I accept that killing people in the 6 and 7 figure numbers may be considered genocide by all rational people. But I also agree with this editorial from the Christian Science Monitor that penalizing free speech, even when that speech is a damaging lie, can have a high cost.
That reminds me (for reasons you will have to bear with me on) of some cool programming my brother did a few years ago. He had a genetic algorithm that would grow digital plants. Each plant had DNA of 100 instructions, and the instructions told the plant which direction to grow in. He would generate some random DNA, put them in a garden, and see which covered the most ground. The losers were all killed off (natural selection), and the winner would be randomly mutated into several new varieties, placed back in the garden, and allowed to compete for space again. After a tens or hundreds of thousands of generations, some pretty sophisticated strategies would emerge, filling the screen with colorful whorls in an amazing variety of shapes. Very cool that essentially random numbers could be coerced into creating complex and beautiful forms! (These aren’t images from the program, they are simply fractal images generated using Apophysis; I needed some illustrations!)
My brother started looking at the digital "DNA" to see how the plants’ algorithm actually worked, and to his surprise found that on average only about 5 of the 100 instructions were actually engaged - the other 95 were "dead code." So he reduced the size to about 5 instructions - and the result was completely uninspiring. Countless generations of mutating those 5 instructions simply never resulted in the variety and beauty possible with 100 instructions. Those 95 unused instructions were vital, not to the "life" of the plant, but to the future evolution of the plant. Despite having no present purpose whatsoever, they provided fertile ground for evolution to blossom in.
Geneticists find the same thing in real DNA - lots of sequences that appear not to serve any functional purpose, or may even have harmful effects, yet are there as a result of the evolutionary journey. If we were able to remove all those dead or harmful sequences most organisms would probably be able to live just fine, perhaps even better in some circumstances. But the potential for evolution would be flattened.
Tying this back to the Armenian Genocide, denying well-documented facts about history seems deluded and hurtful to a civilization. It seems to have no beneficial purpose whatsoever. However, over the course of history there have been many seemingly non-sensical and dangerous theories, a few of which have revolutionized human development and allowed our civilization to evolve in unimagineable ways.
We may not need to believe that well-documented genocides are hoaxes (I certainly hope not!) but a civilization that limits freedom of expression, a crude attempt to limit freedom of thought, is limiting it’s primary potential for evolving to ever higher levels of splendor. That seems like a far graver threat in the long run.
